Doe v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that challenge to emergency rule is not rendered moot because validity of rule is matter of public importance and may évade normal appellate review by reasons of replacement by permanent rule
• “[A] court is not necessarily bound by an agency’s determination of the existence of an emergency, but the court must accord substantial deference to this agency finding, and may only overturn such an emergency finding if it constitutes an abuse of discretion by the agency.”
• emergency regulation terminating State-funded prenatal care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).