· 11/20/2006
Doe v. Village of Mamaroneck
Citations
- 462 F. Supp. 2d 520
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86249
- 2006 WL 3393247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that courts have dispensed with the \similarly situated group\ requirement in cases where the \differential treatment of the target group could otherwise be clearly demonstrated\
- observing that courts have dispensed with the “similarly situated group” requirement in cases where the “differential treatment of the target group could otherwise be clearly demonstrated”
- finding that the chief of the defendant Village’s police department had final policymaking authority as “the executive officer of the police force” who was “vested with decision making authority regarding officer assignments”
- evidence that Village “aggressive[ly] ticketed” Hispanic day laborers but “ ‘did not strictly enforce, and sometimes ignored, traffic and parking infractions that occurred in other part of the Village’ could lead to an inference of discrimination”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMahon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.