Doe v. United States Department of the Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Bartel “recognized an exception to the [rule] for cases in which an inflexible application of that rule would permit agencies to flout the purposes of the Privacy Act”
• noting that Bartel “recognized an exception to the [rule] for cases in which an inflexible application of that rule would permit agencies to flout the purposes of the Privacy Act
• noting that, as a general matter, “[t]he disclosure of information derived solely from independent sources is not prohibited by the statute even though identical information may be contained in [a] system of records” (citation omitted)
• “[T]he timing and substance of the disclosure at issue [can] provide circumstantial evidence of retrieval.”
• “[T]he timing and substance of the disclosure at issue [can] provide circumstantial evidence of retrieval.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).