Doe v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant’s request for a stay pending appeal 5 exacerbated the delay inherent in an interlocutory appeal
• inquiring, in APA challenge to visa adjudication, whether plaintiff fell 10 within zone of interest of “relevant provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act” and 11 acknowledging that in the APA context the test is not “especially demanding”
• \The Clery Act does prohibit private suits based on failure to comply with the Clery Act.\
• “[T]he plaintiff has no standing to pursue this claim since she has not demonstrated that her actions, or any imminent actions she intends to take, have been affected by VAWA’s Section 304 or the actions of the defendants.”
• lapse over one year was too long

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).