Skip to main content
· 3/13/1990

Doe v. Supreme Court of Florida

Citations

  • 734 F. Supp. 981
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2988
  • 1990 WL 26974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \perpetual bar from speaking out about [a] grievance\ may actually discourage filing of grievances
  • expressing doubt that \suppression of truthful criticism of lawyers would somehow enhance or protect the reputation of the Bar\
  • expressing doubt that “suppression of truthful criticism of lawyers would somehow enhance or protect the reputation of the Bar”
  • found the state had failed to present any evidence to substantiate these interests and, regardless, found the rule was not narrowly tailored
  • confidentiality provision concerning complaints against attorneys made to the Florida Bar may not be classified as a valid time, place and manner restriction where the provision acts as an absolute bar to speech or publication regarding the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.