New Mexico Supreme Court· 7/8/1980
Doe v. State
Citations
- 613 P.2d 418
- 94 N.M. 548
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the child's admission to shoplifting was insufficient because, outside of that admission, there was no evidence to establish that the crime of shoplifting had occurred
- holding that although the defendant confessed twice to stealing alcohol, there was no corroborating evidence to support the allegation that the defendant actually stole the alcohol
- holding that a defendant’s confession to stealing alcohol from a grocery store was not corroborated where the independent evidence did not actually connect the defendant to the alcohol
- holding that the child’s admission to shoplifting was insufficient because, outside of that admission, there was no evidence to establish that the crime of shoplifting had occurred
- “The corpus delicti of a crime requires proof that the crime was committed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sosa, Federici, Felter, Easley, Payne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OwelicioNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-07-05· cited 182×
- In re Bruno R.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-02-10· cited 72×
- State v. WeisserNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-12-22· cited 39×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-02-13· cited 29×
- State v. OWELICIONew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-09-09
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 1,280×
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-10-10· cited 119×
- State v. ParisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-05-16· cited 64×
- United States v. Roy L. LehmannFifth Circuit· 1980-03-10· cited 26×
- State v. GruenderNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-11-05· cited 26×
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1968-12-13· cited 11×
- United States v. Rodney Vance HendersonTenth Circuit· 1972-10-13· cited 5×
- State v. GruenderNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1971-12-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.