Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion County, Ind.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiffs entitled to seek immediate relief where forced to risk prosecution for a felony or the immediate loss of expectation of privacy in their home
• declining to extend the special needs doctrine to allow law enforcement to search devices with internet capability at any time for persons registered as sex offenders who were not under any form of supervision
• “By granting unlimited access to these devices, the Indiana legislation crosses the most fundamental boundary under the Fourth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).