Eleventh Circuit· 9/23/2011

Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.

Citations

657 F.3d 1204
2011 WL 4425288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that seaman’s claims relating to shipboard sexual assault must be arbitrated against non- signatory shipowner under terms of seaman’s arbitration agreement with employer
holding that some claims arose out of the plaintiff's employment and were thus arbitrable, while other claims were not
holding that claims arising under the Jones Act and allegations of “unseaworthiness” and “maintenance and cure” “are dependent on [the plaintiffs] status as a seaman employed by the cruise line and the rights that she derives from that employment status”
finding that “parties will not be required to arbitrate when they have not agreed to do so”
stating that “‘related to’ marks a boundary by indicating some direct relationship; otherwise the term would stretch to the horizon and beyond”
noting that the term “related to” is “limiting language” that “marks a boundary by indicating some sort of direct relationship; otherwise, the term would stretch to the horizon and beyond”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Fay and Siler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.