Doe v. Marion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in evaluating a 12(b)(6) motion, a court should not dismiss the complaint “merely because the court doubts the plaintiff will prevail in the action”
• holding that, in evaluating a 12(b)(6) motion, a court should not dismiss the complaint \merely because the court doubts the plaintiff will prevail in the action\
• concluding that mandated-reporter statute impliedly created private right of action
• providing that when reviewing the dismissal of an action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, this court applies the same standard of review as the trial court
• stating that dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) is proper if the facts alleged and inferences reasonably deducible therefrom, when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief on any theory
• stating that dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, is proper if the facts alleged and inferences reasonably deducible therefrom, when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief on any theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).