Doe v. Lafayette School Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Sjimply because [the teacher] used LSC’s equipment and facilities to initiate a relationship with [the victim], his acts did not necessarily fall within his scope of employment.”
• “Doe must first prevail on a negligence claim against LSC; thereafter, she is free to claim damages for emotional distress”
• “Doe must first prevail on a negligence claim against LSC; thereafter, she is free to claim damages for emotional distress”
• “Doe must first prevail on a negligence claim against LSC; thereafter, she is free to claim damages for emotional distress”
• “If some of the employee’s actions were authorized, the question of whether the unauthorized acts were within the scope of employment is one for the jury.”
• “[S]imply because [the teacher] used LSC’s equipment and facilities to initiate a relationship with [the victim], his acts did not neces- sarily fall within his scope of employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).