Skip to main content
· 6/18/2008

Doe v. La Magdalena II, Inc.

Citations

  • 585 F. Supp. 2d 984
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47578
  • 2008 WL 4873440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding plaintiff’s NIED claim preempted because the sexual harassment provisions of the IHRA provided the duty of care that the plaintiff alleged her employer breached
  • dismissing the plaintiff's claims as barred by the Workers' Compensation Act
  • dismissing the plaintiff’s claims as barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act
  • “The [Workers’ Compensation Act] abrogates employer liability for all common law negligence claims.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • preemption “cannot be the basis to dismiss unless plaintiff has pled herself out of court.”
  • dismissing NIED claims as preempted by the IWCA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elaine E. Bucklo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.