Doe v. High-Tech Institute, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that repeated and harassing phone calls give rise to an intrusion upon seclusion claim
• noting that a person who suffers an intrusion upon their seclusion is entitled to recover, among other things, damages for mental suffering
• requiring that the intrusion be “offensive or objectionable to a reasonable person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).