Doe v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “privatization of an activity such as civil commitment that is not a ‘public function[]’ does not mandate an analogous constitutional scrutiny of private actors performing the activity”
• dismissing a § 1983 suit against a private physician because there was no allegation that state officials compelled the private physician to hospitalize the plaintiff for twelve days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).