Doe v. Greiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff's \unsupported and uncorroborated naked assertion that he has worked as an informant and is now in danger is insufficient to set aside the public's interest in open court proceedings\
• holding that plaintiff’s “unsupported and uncorroborated naked assertion that he has worked as an informant and is now in danger is insufficient to set aside the public’s interest in open court proceedings”
• finding that the pe��oner had failed to show that there was a risk of harm because no document filed in federal court described the nature of his work as an informant and there was no indica�on that anyone was ever arrested as a result of his coopera�on
• denying leave to proceed anonymously in habeas corpus case arising out of plaintiff's robbery conviction, as the case did not involve any \matters that are highly sensitive or that implicate issues of privacy\
• denying leave to proceed anonymously in a criminal habeas case because, among other things, the case concerned the petitioner's robbery conviction rather than any \matters that are highly sensitive or that implicate issues of privacy\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).