Doe v. Geller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Such broad jurisdiction, 25 premised solely on the happenstance that many internet companies that are not even parties to 26 [the] litigation have offices in Silicon Valley, is unreasonable.”
• “Such broad jurisdiction, premised solely on the happenstance that many internet 1 companies that are not even parties to [the] litigation have offices in Silicon Valley, is 2 unreasonable.”
• “If plaintiff’s theory of jurisdiction were upheld, then the Northern District of California 2 could assert jurisdiction over every single takedown notice ever sent to YouTube or any other 3 company in Silicon Valley.”
• “If plaintiff's theory of jurisdiction were upheld, then the Northern 16 District of California could assert jurisdiction over every single takedown notice ever sent 17 to YouTube or any other company in Silicon Valley”
• “If plaintiff’s theory of jurisdiction were upheld, then the Northern District of California 2 could assert jurisdiction over every single takedown notice ever sent to YouTube or any other 3 company in Silicon Valley.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).