Doe v. Gallinot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in a section 5150 deten- tion “[t]he initial 72 hours of detention is justified as an emer- gency treatment. It is recognized that a probable cause hearing cannot be arranged immediately.”
• rejecting the State’s argument that “habeas corpus review on demand adequately protects against erroneous” commitment
• upholding a district court’s finding that a seventy-two-hour detention under Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code section 5150 is justified as an emergency measure, provided a probable cause hearing is held shortly thereafter
• “It is the state, after all, which must ultimately justify depriving a person of a protected liberty in-terest_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Washington
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-04-29· cited 176×
• Ronald O. Nelsen Michael Bullene v. King County
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-02-09· cited 113×
• Lake County Mental Health Department v. Susan T.
  California Supreme Court· 1994-12-08· cited 109×
• Luther Tyars v. Dr. Richard Finner, Medical Director of Patton State Hospital, Patton, California
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-06-21· cited 86×
• Sundance v. Municipal Court
  California Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 60×
• Halvorsen v. Baird
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-11· cited 51×
• Nordberg v. Trilegiant Corp.
  N.D. California· 2006-04-04· cited 34×
• Reid v. Donelan
  First Circuit· 2021-10-26· cited 28×
• Cramer v. GILLERMINA R.
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-11-06· cited 21×
• In Re Gandolfo
  California Supreme Court· 1984-09-17· cited 20×
• Ashmus v. Calderon
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-08-18· cited 19×
• J.R. v. Michael Hansen
  Eleventh Circuit· 2015-10-15· cited 14×
• Cal. Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Smith
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-07-22· cited 9×
• St. Joseph Hospital v. Kuyper
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-09-13· cited 5×
• Pederson v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-01-28· cited 4×
• Plum Creek Timber Co., Inc. v. Trout Unlimited
  D. Idaho· 2003-03-31· cited 3×
• Corcoran v. Fletcher
  C.D. California· 2001-07-26· cited 3×
• Bresgal v. Brock
  D. Oregon· 1986-06-26
• Bias v. Moynihan
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-28

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Addington v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
• Sosna v. Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
• Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of America
  Supreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,812×
• Vitek v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,747×
• O'Connor v. Donaldson
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 1,231×
• Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.
  Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 1,215×
• Parham v. J. R.
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,078×
• Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 1,061×
• United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1968-11-25· cited 896×
• Humphrey v. Cady
  Supreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 784×
• A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1961-12-18· cited 226×
• In Re John Ballay, A/K/A Figeret Hoxha, Patient
  D.C. Circuit· 1973-05-31· cited 203×
• Hanes Corporation, a North Carolina Corporation v. Julien Millard
  D.C. Circuit· 1976-01-30· cited 156×
• McGraw Company, a Corporation v. Preformed Line Products Company, a Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1966-05-26· cited 93×
• Fasulo v. Arafeh
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-09-20· cited 57×
• Doe v. Gallinot
  Ninth Circuit· 1981-09-10· cited 57×
• Thorn v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1970-01-26· cited 40×
• Suzuki v. Yuen
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-04-16· cited 40×
• Doe v. Gallinot
  C.D. California· 1979-09-24· cited 27×