Doe v. Florida Bar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff’s challenges “to the Florida Bar’s rules regarding confidential peer review are clearly barred by Rooker- Feldman”
• reviewing de novo “a district court’s decision that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprives it of subject matter jurisdic- tion”
• finding no constitutional violation where the plaintiff’s legal specialist certification was denied because “the full range of legal work” was still available to her
• “We review de novo a district court’s decision that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprives it of subject matter jurisdiction.”
• “We review de novo a district court’s decision that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprives it of subject matter jurisdiction.”
• plaintiff alleging due-process violation must allege “a deprivation of a constitutionally-protected liberty or property interest; state action; and constitutionally inadequate process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).