Doe v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the mootness doctrine and concluding that a challenge to a district court’s denial of the grandparents’ action seeking custody of the grandchild was moot because the grandparents were subsequently awarded guardianship over the grandchild

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Arambarri v. Armstrong
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2012-03-08· cited 33×
• Daniel Paslay v. A&B Irrigation District
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2017-11-29· cited 19×
• Suter v. Biggers
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-11-13· cited 16×
• Re: Guardianship: Bond v. Round
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-12-18· cited 13×
• Bruce Byron Bedke and Jared K. Bedke v. City of Oakley
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2010-05-19· cited 10×
• Mc Lean v. Cheyovich Family Trust
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2012-06-01· cited 10×
• In Re SRBA
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2010-05-19· cited 6×
• Bedke v. CITY OF OAKLEY
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2010-03-18
• Murray v. Dalton
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2024-11-07
• Emily E. Suter v. Jeffrey C. Biggers
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-11-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Revello v. Revello
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-12-07· cited 27×
• Goodson v. Nez Perce County Board
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2000-01-11· cited 26×
• Webb v. Webb
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2006-11-29· cited 12×
• Dorman v. Young
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1958-12-04· cited 6×