Doe v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s Rule 60(b)(4) motion without at least a hearing when the evidence “called into question” whether plaintiff had ever received the defendant’s motion for summary judgment
• the trial court “should not have regarded [the] Rule 60(b) motion as unreasonably delayed” when the appellant never received timely notice of the court’s summary judgment ruling
• “Generally, a party may not rely upon a failure to receive notice of the entry of final judgment as a basis for relief from that judgment under Super. Ct. Civ. R. 60(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).