Doe v. Department of Defense

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant took part in “drug transactions of a similar character, conducted in the same geographical area within [six to No. 07-3399 9 eight] months of the offense of conviction . . . demonstrat[ing] a pattern of continuous drug activity”
• “The agreement may be established by circumstantial evidence, as conspiracies seldom lend themselves to proof by direct evidence.” (quoting United States v. Kaminski 692 F.2d 505, 513 (8th Cir.1982))
• \The nature of the offense of conspiracy with its necessary aspect of secrecy often requires that the agreement be implied from the surrounding circumstances.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).