Doe v. D'AGOSTINO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff had not pointed to authority imposing a heightened negligent infliction of emotional distress standard on teachers
• finding that negligence-based loss of consortium claims against school officials were barred by the MTCA
• explaining that a Section 1983 bodily integrity claim can rest upon abuse of a student by a school official
• finding that school’s failure to protect a student from the abusive acts of a teacher fell well within the scope of the immunity provided by section 10(j) of the MTCA
• where loss of consortium claims are “predicated on negligent acts that are immunized by the MTCA[,]” the “loss of consortium claims ... are also barred by the MTCA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).