Doe v. CUTTER BIOLOGICAL, a DIV. OF MILES INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Idaho law and holding that Doe’s injury was not “objectively ascertainable” until he tested positive for HIV
• applying Idaho law and holding that Doe's injury was not \objectively ascertainable\ until he tested positive for HIV
• granting motion to amend complaint to allow claim of punitive damages after reviewing record evidence and hearing oral argument
• applying Idaho law and holding that Doe’s injury was not “objectively ascertainable” until he tested positive for HIV
• positive HIV test is objective proof of injury and statute of limitations begins to run at that time
• “Whether plaintiff should be allowed to amend her complaint to seek punitive damages is a substantive question controlled by Idaho law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).