Skip to main content
· 3/3/2017

Doe v. Coupe

Citations

  • 158 A.3d 449
  • 2017 WL 837689
  • 2017 Del. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court’s erroneous failure to consider evidence of trade usage in interpreting a contract was harmless because doing so wouldn’t have changed the outcome of the court’s ambiguity analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.