Skip to main content
· 6/14/2012

Doe v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

Citations

  • 352 Or. 77
  • 280 P.3d 377
  • 2012 WL 2149888
  • 2012 Ore. LEXIS 384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “a court is a place where justice is judicially administered,” and adding that 8 Respondent contends that the Bar cannot rely on UTCR 3.130 to support its claim that respondent violated his disclosure obligation under RPC 3.3(a)(4
  • observing that “a court is a place where justice is judicially administered,” and adding that 8 Respondent contends that the Bar cannot rely on UTCR 3.130 to support its claim that respondent violated his disclosure obligation under RPC 3.3(a)(4
  • reviewing for abuse of discretion trial court’s ruling redacting trial exhib- its subject to protective order in face of Article I, section 10, challenge
  • in interpreting the constitution, the court “attempt [s] to understand the provision, if possible, as the framers would have understood it”
  • “The issuance and vacation of protective orders are matters of a trial court’s discretion.”
  • “The issuance and vacation of protective orders are matters of a trial court's discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.