Doe v. City of San Francisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying request to exclude affidavit from consideration on the basis of sham affidavit principle where moving party made conclusory claims and failed to \show how the declarations are inconsistent with deposition testimony\
• applying the Buonocore factors, courts in this Circuit “have consistently held that Article 17 covers injuries sustained close in time to the boarding process and in areas that are near departure gates and limited to ticketed passengers.”
• finding all state law claims preempted by the Montreal Convention including those for false arrest, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment where claims arose from an incident that occurred while plaintiff was traveling from India to Newark, New Jersey
• “Plaintiffs [improperly] make legal arguments in their Rule 56.1 Statement that should appear only in their memorandum of law.”
• citation 1 This matter has since been reassigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul J. Evangelista and the undersigned. omitted
• “Because the Montreal Convention governs the instant case, and the Convention preempts state law claims, it is the only source of liability for [d]efendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).