Skip to main content
· 2/24/1998

Doe v. Child Support Enforcement Agency

Citations

  • 87 Haw. 178
  • 953 P.2d 209
  • 1998 Haw. App. LEXIS 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that determinations about degree of impairment are findings of fact
  • noting that in an inereased-rat-ing claim entitlement to compensation has already been established
  • noting that in an increased-rating claim entitlement to compensation has already been established
  • rejecting appellant's argument that the current disability rating opinion was inadequate because it failed to fully discuss past records
  • finding no Board error where Board focused on most recent medical evidence in claim for increased disability rating not part of adjudication of initial service-connection award
  • “A claimant who has arthritis and instability of the knee may be rated separately under [DCs] 5003 and 5257.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acoba, Burns, Kirimitsu

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.