Doe v. C.A.R.S Protection Plus, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s grant of a motion to proceed anonymously “[a]fter a careful review of all the circumstances of th[e] case.”
• reversing grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment where testimony created “genuine issues of material fact” of whether the defendant’s “asserted reasons for discharging her [were] pretext”
• identifying Title VII pregnancy discrimination elements claim and applying McDonnell Douglas
• “[T]he prohibition [against pregnancy discrimination] is breached ‘whenever an employee’s pregnancy [or related medical condition] is a motivating factor for the employer’s adverse employment decision.’ ”
• “[O]rders releasing sealed material and denying a motion to unseal are collateral orders within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291.” (quoting Republic of Philippines v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 949 F.2d 653, 658 n.4 (3d Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).