Doe v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “Title II, as applied to the postgraduate state university at issue in this case, exceeds Congress’s power under section five”
• holding that state university was entitled to immunity under the Eleventh Amendment
• explaining that Illinois’s limited consent to suit under civil rights statutes, including the ADA, extends only to suits by current, former, and prospective employees of the State for violations committed by the State as an employer
• “[e]very court to have considered the issue *** has concluded that HIPAA does not authorize a private right of action”
• “[e]very court to have considered the issue *** has concluded that HIPAA does not authorize a private right of action”
• “Every court to have considered the issue, however, has concluded that HIPAA does not authorize a private right of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).