Skip to main content
· 8/16/2005

Doe v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of America

Citations

  • 834 N.E.2d 913
  • 359 Ill. App. 3d 684
  • 296 Ill. Dec. 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that Martens rejected Moss’s view that the right to control safety alone sufficient to subject a general contractor to liability
  • reiterating that Martens rejected Moss's view that the right to control safety alone sufficient to subject a general contractor to liability
  • holding that a national mentoring organization did not have custody over a child mentee, in part because “it had no ability to guard or protect [him]; it had no authority over him; and it had no manner in which to dictate any of his activities, how he was cared for, etc.”
  • parent organization did not assume any of the responsibilities associated with the status of guardian to protect a minor from sexual abuse by an employee of a member affiliate
  • generally noting that a person is not liable for harm to another that results from the person’s failure to defend the other against a third party’s criminal attack
  • generally noting that a person is not liable for harm to another that results from the person's failure to defend the other against a third party's criminal attack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.