Doe v. Alaska Superior Court, Third Judicial District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Alaska's right of privacy is implicated by the disclosure of personal information concerning a person's intimate concerns
• noting that we have repeatedly declined to interpret the free-speech provision of the Alaska Constitution as providing absolute immunity against defamation liability, and observing that \[wle have [instead] afforded defendants only a qualified privilege\
• noting that we have repeatedly declined to interpret the free-speech provision of the Alaska Constitution as providing absolute immunity against defamation liability, and observing that “[w]e have [instead] afforded defendants only a qualified privilege”
• involving request for documents in litigation discovery rather than a request under the public records act
• directing trial judges to perform in camera inspection of documents when the government claims that they are protected by the executive privilege
• recognizing as a matter of law executive privilege for governor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).