Doe v. Ainsworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the doctrine is “rarely accepted” in application
• noting that the doctrine is “rarely accepted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wimberly v. Gatch
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1994-04-11· cited 205×
• Harrison v. Gore
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-08-23· cited 41×
• Strata v. Patin
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-06-08· cited 30×
• Doe v. Doe
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-10-06· cited 17×
• Held v. State Farm Ins. Co.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-11-25· cited 13×
• Crosby v. Keys
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-09-10· cited 10×
• GBF v. Keys
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1997-01-22· cited 10×
• Senn v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. STATE UNIV.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-08-21· cited 7×
• Matherne v. Hannan
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-06-05· cited 4×
• Wimberly v. Gatch
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-06-23· cited 1×
• Doe v. Ainsworth
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-04-28

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-10-08· cited 282×
• Laughlin v. Breaux
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-10-14· cited 41×
• Bock v. Harmon
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-05-11· cited 21×

Other cases named Doe v. Ainsworth

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Doe v. Ainsworth
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-04-28· cited 2×
• Doe v. Ainsworth
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-04-28