Skip to main content
· 4/26/2001

Doe v. 2TheMart. Com Inc.

Citations

  • 140 F. Supp. 2d 1088
  • 120 A.L.R. 5th 725
  • 29 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1970
  • 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 404
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5318
  • 2001 WL 435239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the exchange of ideas on the internet is “driven in large part by the ability of Internet users to communicate anonymously”
  • noting that identification is only appropriate where the compelling need for discovery outweighs the First Amendment right of the speakers because litigation may continue without disclosure of the speakers’ identities
  • noting that the exchange of ideas on the internet is “driven in large part by the ability of Internet users to communicate anonymously”
  • noting that identification is only appropriate where the compelling need for discovery outweighs the First Amendment right of the speakers because litigation may continue without disclosure of the speakers’ identities
  • granting motion to quash subpoena seeking identities of anonymous non-party ISP subscribers in shareholder derivative suit
  • noting that identification is only appropriate where the compelling need for discovery outweighs the First Amendment right of the speakers because litigation may continue without disclosure of the speakers’ identities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.