Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 68549 v. Sex Offender Registry Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that hearing examiner did not err by considering sex offenses that plaintiff committed \more than twenty years ago\
• \SORB is required to consider a list of statutory factors in making its classification determinations\
• \A hearing examiner has discretion . . . to consider . . . how much weight to ascribe to each factor . . . \
• classification decision is arbitrary or capricious if it fails to account for factor relevant to offender's risk of recidivism
• \[board] is required to consider a list of statutory factors in making its classification determinations\
• \A hearing examiner has discretion . . . to consider which statutory and regulatory factors are applicable and how much weight to ascribe to each factor\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).