Skip to main content
· 8/21/2015

Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 3839 v. Sex Offender Registry Board

Citations

  • 472 Mass. 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • presumption of registration does not attach new legal consequence to events prior to sex offender registry law
  • individual’s obligation to register was based on contemporane ous evaluation of risk to reoffend and dangerousness, rather than on convictions prior to sex offender registry law
  • final classification must be based on evaluation of offender's risk of reoffense at time reasonably close to date of discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Botsford, Cordy, Duffly, Gants, Lenk, Spina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.