Skip to main content
· 6/13/2013

Doe Run Resources Corporation v. Lexington Insurance Company

Citations

  • 719 F.3d 868
  • 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20135
  • 2013 WL 2631145
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Missouri law and rejecting insured's reliance on Hocker Oil
  • “It is hard to imagine a more perfect overlap between the allegations in a third party’s underlying complaint and’ the operative language of a pollution exclusion.”
  • applying Missouri law and rejecting insured’s reliance on Hocker Oil

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Murphy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.