Doe on the demise of Harrison v. Botts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that section 1920(4) “is not so broad as to cover general electronic discovery costs that precede copying or scanning of materials . . . . [C]osts for document collection, processing, and hosting are not permitted”
• rejecting a bill “in excess of $2 million for document collection, processing, and hosting[]” as not recoverable under § 1920

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).