Skip to main content
· 9/23/1985

Doe Ex Rel. Roe v. Gaughan

Citations

  • 617 F. Supp. 1477
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that restraint of a patient was constitutional because the patient was and remains “an. extremely assaultive, dangerous individual”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Caffrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.