Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. East Lyme Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the IDEA requires a local educational agency to fund a private stay-put placement, notwithstanding an agreement by the parties to the contrary
• noting that the school district had agreed to pay for services at a new private school, and requiring the district to maintain those services under the stay-put provision
• noting that the school district had agreed to pay for services at a new private school, and requiring the district to maintain those services under the stay-put provision
• noting that the school district had agreed to pay for services at a new private school, and requiring the district to maintain those services under the stay-put provision
• finding no procedural violation where parent “fully participated in the June 17, 2009 meeting of the [PPT] at which the 2009-2010 placement was discussed”
• rejecting a parent’s procedural violation claim because she fully participated in the IEP team meeting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).