Skip to main content
· 10/8/2002

Doe 1 v. City of Murrieta

Citations

  • 126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 213
  • 102 Cal. App. 4th 899
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 11757
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10234
  • 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • police 1 department that sponsored “explorer program” was in special relationship with the teenage 2 explorers and owed them “a duty of care to protect them from foreseeable harm,” including 3 from sexual relationship with police officer who served as adviser during ride-alongs at 4 night

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gaut

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.