Dodge v. Susquehanna University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a motion for reconsideration “is not to be used as a means ‘to reargue matters already argued and disposed of’ by prior rulings ‘or to put forward additional arguments which [the movant] could have made but neglected to make before judgment’”
• ‘[A]ny litigant considering bringing a motion to reconsider based upon ... [clear error and manifest injustice] should evaluate whether what may seem to be a clear error of law is in fact simply a disagreement between the Court and the litigant.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).