Skip to main content
· 5/13/1901

Dodge v. Nevada Nat. Bank of San Francisco

Citations

  • 109 F. 726
  • 48 C.C.A. 626
  • 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a party must “specifically detail the reasons why” a request is irrelevant
  • noting that a party must “specifically detail the reasons why” a request is irrelevant
  • finding general objections to vagueness were themselves “vague and impermissibly overbroad”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boss, Gilbert, Hawley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.