Dodge v. Legion Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Mugavero and noting that in similar cases, “if the act is intentional,' so is the harm, and the courts will not inquire into the perpetrator’s subjective intent to cause the injury” (emphasis supplied)
• for inherently injurious acts, cause and effect cannot be separated, and if the act is intentional, so is the harm; courts thus will not inquire into whether perpetrator had subjective intent to cause injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).