Doctors Hospital Facilities v. Fifth Court of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing right of access to an appellate tribunal is a substantial right protected against arbitrary and unreasonable abrogation
• recognizing right of access to an appellate tribunal is a substantial right protected against arbitrary and unreasonable abrogation
• stating that the requisites for mandamus are a legal duty to perform a non-discretionary act, a demand for performance, and a refusal
• recognizing right of access to an appellate tribunal is a substantial right protected against arbitrary and unreasonable abrogation
• stating that the requisites for mandamus are a legal duty to perform a non- discretionary act, a demand for performance, and a refusal
• stating that the requisites for mandamus are a legal duty to perform a non- discretionary act, a demand for performance, and a refusal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).