Doctor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant should have been discharged when state did not file charges within 175 days of his arrest and noting that state is not entitled to recapture period when state has not filed charges within that 175-day period
• “But the state loses the benefit of the recapture provision if it neglects to file charges until after expiration of the 175-day speedy trial period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garrett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-27
• Contreras-Garcia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-22