Doctor v. Lakeridge Constr. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had not established a claim for rescission because the alleged representations were true and that, in any case, the plaintiff waived his right to rescind because he delayed three years after the action had been filed to notify defendant of his intent to rescind
• holding that plaintiff had not established a claim for rescission because the alleged representations were trae and that, in any case, the plaintiff waived his right to rescind because he delayed three years after the action had been filed to notify defendant of his intent to rescind

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).