Dockins v. Hines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Tenth Circuit has not clearly settled whether sufficiency of the evidence on habeas review presents a question of law or fact
• recognizing that this Court has yet to decide whether sufficiency of the evidence on habeas review presents a question of law or fact
• recognizing that this Court has yet to decide whether sufficiency of the evidence on habeas review presents a question of law or fact
• holding that the “[Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act]’s deferential treatment of state court decisions must be incorporated into our consideration of a habeas petitioner’s request for [a certificate of appealability]”
• noting that the “Supreme Court has never recognized a federal constitutional right to a lesser included offense instruction in non-capital cases”
• noting that “[t]he Supreme Court has never recognized a federal constitutional right to a lesser included offense instruction in non-capital cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).