Docherty v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state malpractice claims against insurer for negligently failing to obtain replacement insurance plan was not preempted
• holding that state malpractice claims against insurer for negligently failing to obtain replacement insurance plan was not preempted
• holding that state malpractice claims against insurer for negligently failing to obtain replacement insurance plan was not preempted
• holding that Ingersoll-Rand does not require preemption of state-law malpractice claim against insurers
• concluding that plan sponsor has “standing to sue as a fiduciary ‘to the extent’ that it challenges, as violative of ERISA ..., any act or practice which pertains to” the fiduciary responsibilities it possesses
• holding that Ingersoll-Rand does not require preemption of state-law malpractice claim against insurers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).