Dobson v. Hartford Financial Servs.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that any payment outside of the time-frames in the DOL’s regulations is per se unreasonable on the basis that “the Second Circuit [in Dwnnigan] simply observed that it would be possible to ascertain a point at which [Met-Life’s actions] became unreasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).