Dobson v. Dobson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “IRS’s determination for innocent spouse relief is not entitled to preemption or res judicata because it involves only an administrative process rather than an adjudication”
• concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in apportioning delinquent tax liability to an “innocent spouse” in part because the “[innocent spouse] did not present evidence that the money the family had as a result of the underpayment of taxes was not spent on family expenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Marriage of Rose
  Montana Supreme Court· 2016-01-12· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meints v. Meints
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-17· cited 130×
• Neidlinger v. Neidlinger
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2001-08-23· cited 74×
• Clark v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1990-01-05· cited 60×
• Brosick v. Brosick
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1998-07-24· cited 41×
• Moss v. Moss
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1982-03-12· cited 28×
• Weldon v. Weldon
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1997-10-10· cited 23×
• Robinette v. Robinette
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1987-07-24· cited 22×
• Carter v. Carter
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2001-06-01· cited 19×
• Estate of Silvio Ravetti v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-10-11· cited 16×
• Platt v. Platt
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1987-04-24· cited 15×
• Killough v. Killough
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-12-06· cited 3×
• Franz v. Franz
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1999-02-23· cited 3×