Skip to main content
· 11/20/1891

Dobinson v. McDonald

Citations

  • 92 Cal. 33
  • 27 P. 1098
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating on direct appeal the portion of the trial court’s order which dismissed the plaintiff’s 3 claims on their merits and remanding with direction that these claims be dismissed because they were barred by sovereign immunity
  • citation and 2 See Schick v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. Sys. of Ga., 334 Ga. App. 425, 426 (779 SE2d 452) (2015). 3 See Ayers v. Yancey Bros. Co., 141 Ga. App. 358, 361 (2) (233 SE2d 471) (1977
  • although trial court did not rule on sovereign immunity question, because sovereign immunity did not bar petition for writ of mandamus, appellate court could consider whether trial court erred in granting summary judgment on the merits with respect to mandamus claim
  • sovereign immunity bars claims for injunctive relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.